Project Vetting

R&D Focus

Project Database

Project Partners

Funding Programmes

Call for Proposals

Application & Vetting

Project Vetting

Vetting Criteria

Please refer to Part C of Guide to Filling in the ITSP Applications Form or Part C of Guide to Filling in the TCFS Applications Form.

Vetting Process

I. Platform Research Programme

Vetting Process

Applicant submits proposal according to the requirements set in the Call for Proposal.
Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of all the Proposals received. If the Proposal is not considered ready, Centre may request the Applicants to provide further information.
Centre reviews all the proposals with consultation from ITC, and prepares Observation Form for each proposal.
Centre Secretariat will select 6-10 panelists from the member of Expert Review Panel (ERP) based on their area of expertise and domain knowledge.

• Centre Secretariat sends all ready proposals with Observation Forms to the members of the ERP.
With reference to ITC assessment framework, ERP members review all the proposals, make comments and recommendations and give scores for the following four (4) components:

i. Innovation and Technology

ii. Technical Capability

iii. Financial Considerations

iv. Existence of a Holistic Plan to Realisation/Commercialisation

• ERP members send all comments to Centre.
With reference to ERP's recommendations and scores, Centre Secretariat and ITC will jointly determine Preliminary Scores (all components of the ITC assessment framework) for each proposal and to shortlist proposals for TC vetting.
Centre sends the shortlists to TC 2 weeks before TC meeting. TC members can request Centre to add other proposals into the shortlists by informing the Centre one (1) week before TC meeting.
Centre selects a good representation of ERP panelists to attend the TC meeting and share their comments on respective proposals. Subject to their availability, it is desirable to have two/ three ERP panelists attending the TC meeting to explain views of the ERP. The ERP panelists will not participate in the TC decision process and shall be excused from the meeting when the TC concludes the Final Score and Recommendation Decision.
With reference to ITC assessment framework, TC meets to evaluate all the proposals, taking into consideration the (i) ERP's recommendations and scores; (ii) Preliminary Score; (iii) ITC assessment.

• Only shortlisted applicants will be invited to attend the TC meeting.

• For each proposal, TC Chairman will take into account TC members' opinions to conclude a Final Score and Recommendation Decision.

• If a Proposal is vetted as "Not Recommended" by the TC, notification with reasons will be sent to the Applicant. Process ends.

• If a Proposal is vetted as "Recommended" by the TC, TC will make recommendation to ITC.
Centre Secretariat may, based on TC's recommendation:

• instruct Applicant to update the Proposal

• negotiate Intellectual Property (IP) terms and conditions with Applicant

The Applicant has to submit revised proposal in time
Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of the Proposal and forwards the revised Proposal to ITC.
Commissioner for Innovation & Technology (CIT) makes decision regarding the Proposal.

• If CIT approves the Proposal, ITC will notify Centre Secretariat. The Centre Secretariat will inform the Applicant and respective ERP panellists, if any. Process proceeds to contract negotiation.

• If CIT does not approve the Proposal, ITC will notify Centre Secretariat. Centre Secretariat will notify Applicant and report back to TC.
Contract negotiation and signing

II. Partnership Research Programme

Vetting Process

Applicant submits proposal to the Centre.
Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of the proposal received. If the proposal is not considered ready, Centre may request the applicant to provide further information.
Centre Secretariat reviews the proposal and prepares Observation form together with Centre's CEO recommendations for the proposal.
Centre Secretariat arranges Pre-Panel meeting with Science Advisor and the technical team of ITC; and forwards the proposal to ITC Administration team.
Centre Secretariat arranges Panel meeting. The Panel constitutes of CIT or the CIT's delegate, Technology committee (TC) Chairman and Centre CEO, where the TC Chairman will serve as the Chairman of the Panel.
Panel members meet to evaluate the proposal and make decisions on behalf of TC.

• If the proposal is vetted as "No" by the Panel, notification with reasons will be sent to applicant.

• If the proposal is vetted as "Yes" by the Panel, Centre Secretariat may instruct applicant to update the proposal based on Panel's recommendations.
Applicant has to submit revised proposal in time.
Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of the proposal and forwards the revised proposal to CIT for funding considerations.

III. Public Sector Trial Scheme

Vetting Process

Applicant submits proposal to the Centre.
Centre Secretariat, with consultation from ITC, reviews and checks that the proposal received is complete. If the proposal is not considered ready, Centre may request the applicant to provide further information.
Centre Secretariat arranges Panel meeting. The Panel constitutes of ITC representative, Technology committee (TC) Chairman and Centre CEO, where the TC Chairman will serve as the Chairman of the Panel.
Panel members meet to evaluate the proposal and make decisions on behalf of TC.

• If the proposal is vetted as "No" by the Panel, notification with reasons will be sent to applicant.

• If the proposal is vetted as "Yes" by the Panel, Centre Secretariat may instruct applicant to update the proposal based on Panel's recommendations.
Applicant has to submit revised proposal in time.
Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of the proposal and forwards the revised proposal to CIT for funding considerations.

Assessment Committee

Technology Committee

Chairman

Ir Alan LAM

Members

Prof Gary CHAN	Ms Annie CHOI	Ms Ada FUNG
Dr Venus LUN	Mr William YIM

Members of Expert Review Panel

Mr. Dennis Cai	Mr. Adrian Lai	Mr. Peter WT Shum
Dr. Sunny Chai	Dr. Jeanne Lam	Mr. Warwick So
Prof. Yang Chai	Mr. Philip Lam	Mr. KK Suen
Mr. Alex Chan	Prof. William Lam	Mr. Ronnie Sung
Dr. CL Chan	Dr. Henry Lau	Ir. Samson Tai
Miss. Dona Chan	Mr. Lawrence Lau	Mr. Matthew Tam
Dr. Edward Chan	Dr. Peggy Lau	Ir. Alain Tang
Mr. Edwin Chan	Dr. Terence Lau	Prof. SK Tang
Prof. Gary Chan	Dr. Teresa Law	Mr. Otto To
Prof. Keith Chan	Mr. Eddie Lee	Ir. Dr. Aaron Tong
Ir. Kenneth Chan	Mr. Felix Lee	Prof. Raymond Tong
Dr. Neo Chan	Mr. Ivan Lee	Mr. Miles Wen
Ir. Mr. Stephen Chan	Prof. Jimmy Lee	Mr. Paul Won
Mr. Tony Chan	Mr. Kelvin Lee	Dr. Allen Wong
Prof. Wu Chen	Mr. Kinsen Lee	Mr. CH Wong
Mr. Andrew Cheng	Mr. Ricardo Lee	Mr. Charles Wong
Prof. Jack Cheng	Mr. Wilson Lee	Mr. David Wong
Prof. SW Cheng	Mr. Envel Leung	Mr. John Wong
Dr. William KW Cheung	Mr. Owen Leung	Prof. Kam Fai Wong
Ir. Dr. William SS Cheung	Prof. LI Heng	Prof. Kenneth Wong
Ir. PK Cheung	Mr. Ying Li	Mr. Patrick Wong
Ir. Prof. Daniel Chow	Prof. LIN Hui	Ms. Rabo Wong
Dr. KP Chow	Mr. Kyle Lin	Ir Prof. SC Wong
Ir. Alex Choy	Prof. Cecilia Li-Tsang	Prof. TN Wong
Prof. CS Choy	Mr. Albert Liu	Dr. Albert Wong
Mr. Eric Chu	Prof. YH Liu	Prof. KT Woo
Ir. Stewart Chun	Prof. Eric Lo	Mr. Damien Wu
Mr. Ken Chung	Mr. Samuel Lo	Prof. KL Wu
Prof. Henry Chung	Prof. Daniel Zhuoyu Long	Dr. Qi Wu
Prof. Xiao-Li Ding	Dr. Wilson Lu	Mr. Lawrence (Larry) Yee
Prof. Pheng Ann	Ir. Steven Lui	Dr. Benjamin Yen
Mr. Argon Ho	Dr. Brian Mak	Prof. DY Yeung
Ir. Dr. David Ho	Mr. York Mok	Dr. Winson Yeung
Mr. Philip Ho	Dr. Horace Mui	Mr. Johnson Yim
Mr. Sunny Ho	Dr. Alfred Ng	Dr. Steven Yip
Mr. Chris Huang	Ir. Prof. Joseph Ng	Mr. Alvin Yong
Prof. George Huang	Mr. Peter Ng	Prof. Jeffrey Yu
Mr. Allan Hui	Prof. Thomas NG	Prof. Patrick Yue
Dr. Pan Hui	Mr. Jimmy Pang	Ms. Angela Yuen
Mr. Kelvin Ko	Prof. Jin Qi	Prof. Matthew Yuen
Prof. Yong Hong Kuo	Prof. Huamin Qu	Mr. Jack Zhang
Prof. Albert Kwan	Prof. Geoffrey Shen	Dr. Zijun Zhang
Ir. Wilson Kwok	Prof. John Shi	Dr. Ray Zhong
Prof. James Kwok	Mr. Peter KW Shum

Careers Contact Us Useful Links Staff Intranet Sitemap Disclaimer

LSCM: Logistics and Supply Chain MultiTech R&D Centre

LSCM is Hong Kong’s leading facilitator of research and development (R&D) across numerous sectors, both public and private. With an extensive database of projects accumulated over the years, LSCM fosters technological innovation to improve efficiency in logistics and supply chain industries. Hong Kong is considered one of the world’s leading centers of logistical professionalism, and LSCM aims to reinforce this position through the continuous improvement of technological facilities.